For more than 3,000 years, Western literature has grappled with the relationship between the Greek heroes Achilles and Patroclus. For queer cultural history, it is of particular significance—not despite, but because of a problem that has accompanied it from the outset. In Homer’s Iliad, the earliest surviving source, we encounter a bond of extraordinary intimacy that cannot be clearly classified as either friendship or romantic love.
To this ambiguity is added another irritation. Even if it is a libidinous relationship between Achilles and Patroclus, it does not fit the classical Greek model of pedagogical-erotic bonds, which rests on a clear hierarchy of age, status, and role. Patroclus appears older, yet Achilles is the superior warrior; Patroclus follows Achilles, but he is also his moral corrective and emotional anchor. The roles are not clearly distributed, but rather intertwined. It is precisely these ruptures that make the relationship narratively so alluring—and at the same time unsettling, because it eludes expectation.
Top-Bottom Debate Already in Antiquity
Already in antiquity, the ambivalence of the relationship was debated. Plato and Aeschylus attempt to classify Achilles and Patroclus within the familiar categories of the time. Their ideas about who should assume which role are opposed: while for Aeschylus Achilles takes the leading part, Plato reverses the hierarchy and places Patroclus in the dominant position. Other contemporary authors deny any erotic connection in the relationship altogether. A love story beyond the classic power relations apparently seems impossible.
In the Middle Ages, the transition to a Christian-influenced world brings a profound shift in how bodies, desire, and heroism are perceived. Homer fades largely from memory. The Iliad is known mainly through secondary sources or Latin summaries, and the relationship between Achilles and Patroclus receives little mention. Yet it does not vanish completely: in the Renaissance, interest awakens again.
To Shakespeare, They Were a Gay Couple
In Shakespeare’s ambivalent antiwar satire Troilus and Cressida, Achilles and Patroclus are unmistakably marked as a gay couple, exposed in the scornful and sometimes hostile remarks of their fellow soldiers. Odysseus tells Agamemnon that the two “on a bed of dust and folly” spend the livelong day engaging in cheeky mischief, while the demagogue Thersites describes their love as “unnatural” and insults Patroclus as a “male whore.”
In the Romantic era, the gaze shifts again: Antiquity is no longer merely a historical narrative and interpretation, but becomes a sanctuary for aesthetic longing—a desire that finds no legitimate outlet in the contemporary milieu. A key figure is the archaeologist Johann Joachim Winckelmann, who in the eighteenth century laid the groundwork for modern art history and, in his reception of antiquity, idealized the male body and charged it with homoerotic significance. In English Romanticism, this movement finds a literary counterpart in Lord Byron: Achilles and Patroclus become projection figures of excess and homosexual passion, though such feelings may only be expressed indirectly—in the pathos of heroism, in the reverence for the male body, in metaphors of friendship, loyalty, and sacrifice. An open confession remains unthinkable.
Only at the dawn of the twenty-first century does the transmitted relationship story become unambiguous. In his action-packed Hollywood film Troy, Wolfgang Petersen does away with any homoerotic undertones and frames the relationship as a familial bond: the two are merely cousins—a reading for which there is no precedent in the literary history.
Madeline Miller Tells a Same-Sex Love Story
However, the classicist and writer Madeline Miller stays within the epic tradition with her 2011 novel The Song of Achilles, in which she unmistakably tells a same-sex love story. Miller adds fictional elements, such as a shared childhood for Achilles and Patroclus, as well as explicit romance and homosexual desire. Her interventions sharpen the characters rather than distorting the myth. The two protagonists meet on equal footing from the start—their relationship is explicitly not hierarchical, but rather a mutually entwined bond between two peers. Miller’s bestseller also persuasively links the queer couple to the female characters.
More confidently than in other retellings and variants of the Iliad myth, Miller narrates the episode in which her hero, to evade war, assumes the identity of a girl named Pyrrha and hides on an island. He appears in a performance in female disguise—a scene Miller portrays with humor, without slipping into slapstick.
Only with the brief but intense affair between Achilles and the Amazon Penthesilea on the battlefield of the Trojan War does Miller not quite engage as fully—she probably condenses it to a half-page in her otherwise expansive novel. Yet this subplot would be entirely compatible with a queer reading of the Iliad.
The queer community needs a strong journalistic voice—now more than ever. Do your part to support the work of TheColu.mn.
Why the Achilles and Patroclus Narrative Remains Significant
In his book My Year with Achilles. The Iliad, Death, and Life, philologist Jonas Grethlein frames the Penthesilea episode as a cruel yet meaningful act of insight that provides a thematic counterpoint to the war’s violence: at the moment Achilles kills the Amazon, he feels drawn to her—love and desire unfold only in the awareness of finitude, but in this instance, it is too late. Similarly, in the Achilles–Patroclus relationship, it is only after his unexpected death that the existential dimension of their bond becomes clear.
This aspect also touches queer cultural history: where desire has historically been pursued, pathologized, or rendered invisible and then confronted with mortality, it remains often fleeting, risky, and intense—reflected in an aesthetic of intoxication and ecstasy. Therefore, the narrative of Achilles and Patroclus continues to matter in all its facets—not least because queerness has been inscribed in world literature from the very start.
