gazelkareligiousfreedom

Sen. Paul Gazelka of Nisswa, flanked by Rep. Tim Miller of Prinsburg and Sen. Warren Limmer of Maple Grove, introduced the “Religious Freedom Bill” on Thursday at a press conference at the Minnesota Capitol. The bill, SF2158, would allow religious entities and small businesses to refuse services to same-sex couples.

Here is the full video of the press conference courtesy of The Uptake

“Before we start about what the bill is, I want to talk about what the bill is not,” Gazelka said. “This is not a bill to discriminate against gays and lesbians. This is not a bill to prevent a gay couple from getting the services they need for a wedding service. This bill is not modern day Jim Crow laws as I’ve heard stated about other bills similar to this Jim Crow laws were state sponsored discrimination. This is not a bill to end gay marriage.”

Gazelka said he introduced the bill after a religious business owner discriminated against a same-sex couple in 2014 and was fined by the Minnesota Department of Human Rights:

Last summer a Catholic family in my district chose not to hold a gay wedding ceremony on their private property. The decision was based on the religious beliefs that gay marriage was wrong. Like many, they believe marriage is a sacred ceremony between a man and a woman, and they told the young men they would not have the ceremony on their property because of their belief. They were polite, respectful, but they could not violate their conscience. That’s when the hammer dropped. The Minnesota Human Rights Commission forced them to pay over $9,000 of restitution and legal fees. Because they did not want to have the wedding there, they ended up having the wedding somewhere else and they had to pay for that and the reception. I don’t think that’s right. It’s not right to deny anyone services simply because of who they are, but it’s also not right to force someone to celebrate a gay wedding if they think it’s wrong. These opposing worldviews have crashed head on and the only way for our divided culture to move forward is for both sides to be able to live as they please. Both sides have to leave a little room for the other side to disagree.

The Column is a community-supported non-profit news, arts, and media organization. We depend on community support to continue the work of solid LGBT-centric journalism. If you like this article, consider visiting Give MN to make a contribution today.

2 COMMENTS

  1. What Senator Gazelka (like so many others) is doing is creating a false equivalency between LGBTQ “people” and one group’s religious (evangelical Christians) “beliefs”. The are not equal as so many imply, one relates to living , breathing human beings and they other refers to what another group thinks. Also worth noting is that while these evangelicals are opposed to all things gay they do not speak for the entire faith community which is a legal problem for their argument. I say one group because many believers of many faiths including Christianity, are affirming of LGBTQ people so legislating in favor of one’s groups religious beliefs is nothing short of religious promotion by government and clearly violates the establishment clause.
    Gay people marrying in no way impedes or impacts the marriages of straight evangelicals and to claim otherwise is completely untrue. Providing a cake or photography in no way changes a person’s personal belief. They are asked to provide a professional service, not to change their personal thoughts on the subject. While I don’t believe this law can even pass the scrutiny of the lemon test at the very least if it should pass, people should who claim this “religious freedom to discriminate” should be forced to disclose that upfront and publicly so people like myself (a straight, married, LGBTQ ally) can avoid using services or goods of businesses that openly discriminate because that is against my religious beliefs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here